# Bro : an opinion

**URL:** <https://community.zeek.org/t/bro-an-opinion/170>\
**Category:** Zeek\
**Created:** [July 7, 2001, 7:18am UTC](https://community.zeek.org/t/bro-an-opinion/170 "2001-07-07T07:18:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vern](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/community.zeek.org/vern/32/630_2.png) [@Vern](https://community.zeek.org/u/Vern)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2001, 7:18am UTC](https://community.zeek.org/t/bro-an-opinion/170/1 "2001-07-07T07:18:24Z")

</div>

> I know that bro runs on almost all the OSs like  
> OpenBSD/Linux/Sloaris etc.
> 
> But from your experience, on which OS does bro run/execute  
> fastest ? i mean the time taken considering the whole system including  
> bro and libpcap..
> 
> It is just to get an opinion regarding the matter.
> 
> It will surely depend on the fact that on some OSs libpcap executes  
> faster and so one but could you give a general observation ...

I run it just under FreeBSD. I would expect that it runs \*much\* better  
on systems that have kernel packet filters that libpcap knows how to take  
advantage of, which pretty much means BPF systems like \*BSD.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Vern

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/zeek/original/1X/f09d732bc2cc7c7cc7e35db67cf4e1d5233ce7a7.png) [@system](https://community.zeek.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2022, 3:36pm UTC](https://community.zeek.org/t/bro-an-opinion/170/2 "2022-05-06T15:36:21Z")

</div>


